QuantumEVM, a Layer 1 chain suitable with the Ethereum Digital Machine (EVM) and designed with quantum resistance from the bottom up, launched its testnet (testnet) public this March 17, as defined by Ian Smith, CEO and technical director of the challenge.
The principle goal of QuantumEVM is to allow Ethereum ecosystem buildings (decentralized purposes, good contracts, and so forth.) simply migrate to a community that goals to be safe in opposition to post-quantum threatswith out dropping compatibility with present instruments, equivalent to wallets.
The supervisor introduced that the group needed to fully redesign the EVM’s reminiscence structure in order that QuantumEVM is proof against quantum pc assaults.
The central change is the migration of 20-byte addresses, the Ethereum customary and all supported networks, to 32 byte addresses.
The CEO additionally clarified that QuantumEVM runs on Cellframe, an open supply base community geared toward scalability and post-quantum safety, makes use of the proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus mechanism and permits purposes and good contracts to be migrated from Ethereum virtually instantly, whereas sustaining compatibility with the EVM customary.
Moreover, Smith assures that QuantumEVM will use post-quantum cryptography (PQC), though neither he nor the challenge documentation specify which particular algorithm they may implement.
The challenge paperwork do state that the technique is “hybrid and configurable”: The system permits you to use a number of key schemes and select between them by means of configuration information, with the purpose of facilitating fast migrations within the occasion of future quantum assaults.
In accordance with Smith, within the subsequent “three months” the challenge will incorporate full homomorphic encryption (FHE), which permits information to be processed with out decrypting it, and PQC acceleration by graphics processing models (GPUs).
Why is 20 bytes not sufficient?
Ethereum addresses are 160 bits (20 bytes) and are generated utilizing hash capabilities. As defined by Smith, that dimension is susceptible to the BHT (Brassard-Høyer-Tapp) algorithm, a 1997 quantum technique designed to search out collisions in hash capabilities.
For 20-byte addresses, in line with the QuantumEVM government, the BHT would require roughly 10¹⁶ quantum operations to discover a collision and violate these addresses, that’s, two totally different inputs that produce the identical tackle, and probably entry different folks’s funds with out having to steal personal keys.
In accordance with Smith, the danger is bigger in Ethereum than in Bitcoin. Good contract addresses in EVM networks are generated utilizing a hash plus a nonce, which would produce a less complicated, simpler to assault quantum circuit. Bitcoin, alternatively, derives its addresses by means of a non-public key, a public key and two totally different hash capabilities, which makes the circuit essential for the assault extra advanced.
The answer applied by QuantumEVM is transfer to 256-bit (32-byte) addresses. At that dimension, the identical BHT assault would require about 2⁸⁵ operations, Smith estimated, a threshold that will be infeasible in apply.
May Ethereum apply the identical resolution?
Technically, sure. Since 2021 there was a debate thread on Ethereum Magicians, the reference discussion board for Ethereum builders, concerning the migration of addresses from 20 to 32 bytes, though the final remark occurred in August 2025, which might point out that there could be different priorities within the Ethereum ecosystem.
The proposals embrace new opcodes for producing 32-byte addresses and compatibility mechanisms with present contracts.
The impediment just isn’t technical however structural. Nearly the whole Ethereum ecosystem, contracts underneath the ERC-20 and ERC-721 requirements, wallets, exchanges, indexers and bridges, assumes 20-byte addresses.
Migrating would suggest a giant scale onerous forka brand new technology of addresses and compression mechanisms to take care of compatibility with legacy contracts. As of March 2026, there isn’t any formal proposal underway or outlined date for that transition.
Different options and roadmap
Along with the tackle redesign, Smith described different capabilities of the QuantumEVM community. Transactions observe a strict first-come, first-served order, which the group says eliminates the potential for validators reordering operations to extract worth on the expense of customers, a apply often called MEV (most extractable worth).
Moreover, the price of gasoline is fastened in greenback phrases and varies inversely to the worth of the native QEVM token. The challenge additionally has a bridge to Ethereum and BNB Good Chain.
In accordance with the revealed roadmap, within the first quarter of 2026 the challenge contemplates the general public sale of the token, the itemizing on centralized exchanges and the beginning of its first safety audit.
Lastly, for the second quarter it tasks the launch of the mainnet, staking, full availability of the EVM and DeFi instruments. Within the third quarter it plans to launch wallets for Android and iOS.
